Do I Have A Medical Malpractice-Wrongful Death Case?

The scope of the medical malpractice issue.

Stats vary significantly on the number of medical errors that happen in the United States. place the number of medical errors in excess of one million yearly while other studies place the number as low as a few hundred thousand. is extensively accepted however that iatrogenic illness (disease or injury caused by a medical mistake or medical treatment) is the 3rd leading cause of death in the United States after heart disease and cancer. See, The JOURNAL of the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000.

As an attorney who has actually limited his practice to representation of victims injured by someone else's neglect, medical or otherwise, I have actually gotten thousands of calls from potential clients over the last 20 years asking me if they have a medical malpractice case. Because medical malpractice litigation is really expensive and really lengthy the attorneys in our company are very careful exactly what medical malpractice cases where we opt to get included. It is not at all uncommon for a lawyer, or law office to advance litigation expenses in excess of $100,000.00 simply to obtain a case to trial. These costs are the expenses associated with pursuing the litigation which include professional witness charges, deposition costs, show preparation and court expenses. What follows is an overview of the issues, questions and considerations that the lawyers in our company think about when going over with a customer a prospective medical malpractice case.

Exactly What is Medical Malpractice?

Medical Malpractice is medical treatment that breaches of the "Requirement of Care" for medical physicians (or nurses, chiropractic practitioners, dental professionals, podiatric doctors etc.) which leads to an injury or death. "Requirement of Care" suggests medical treatment that a sensible, prudent medical provider in the exact same community should supply. Many cases involve a dispute over exactly what the relevant standard of care is. The standard of care is generally offered through the use of specialist testament from speaking with doctors that practice or teach medicine in the exact same specialized as the accused( s).

When did the malpractice take place (Statute of Limitations)?

Rand Spear Law Office
Two Penn Center Plaza, 1500 John F Kennedy Blvd #200, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
+1 215-985-2424

In Ohio the medical malpractice statute of restrictions is one year from the date of the malpractice, or the last date the offender dealt with the complainant (victim) or the date the plaintiff found or reasonably ought to have found the malpractice. Some states have a 2 year statute of restrictions. In Ohio if the victim is a small the statute of restrictions will not even start to run until the minor ends up being 18 years of ages. Be advised nevertheless acquired claims for parents may run many years previously. If you think you may have a case it is essential you call a legal representative quickly. Regardless of the statute of constraints, physicians transfer, witnesses disappear and memories fade. The earlier counsel is engaged the earlier important evidence can be maintained and the much better your possibilities are of prevailing.

Exactly what did the doctor do or cannot do?

Simply because a patient does not have an effective arise from a surgery, medical procedure or medical treatment does not in and of itself mean the physician slipped up. Medical practice is by no suggests an assurance of health or a total healing. Most of the time when a patient experiences a not successful result from medical treatment it is not because the medical company slipped up. The majority of the time when there is a bad medical outcome it is in spite of great, quality medical care not because of sub-standard healthcare.

3 Things You Should Consider Before Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer

Personal injury law functions to help clients and their families receive the compensation and justice they deserve. Unfortunately, civil litigation is not always so cut and dry. Whether it be a case of intent or negligence, it’s crucial that you choose a personal injury best suited for your individual case. Here are 3 things to consider before hiring a personal injury lawyer: 3 Things You Should Consider Before Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer

When talking about a possible case with a client it is essential that the client have the ability to inform us why they believe there was medical neglect. As we all know individuals typically die from cancer, heart disease or organ failure even with great medical care. Nevertheless, we also know that individuals generally should not pass away from knee surgery, appendix elimination, hernia repair or some other "small" surgical treatment. When something extremely unexpected like that happens it certainly deserves checking out whether there was a medical error. If in doubt most medical malpractice legal representatives will discuss your case with you informally on the telephone. Many lawyers do not charge for an initial assessment in carelessness cases.

So what if there was a medical error (near cause)?

In any neglect case not only is the burden of proof on the complainant to show the medical malpractice the complainant must likewise show that as a direct result of the medical neglect some injury or death resulted (damages). This is called "proximate cause." Given that medical malpractice lawsuits is so costly to pursue the injuries should be considerable to require moving forward with the case. All medical mistakes are "malpractice" nevertheless just a little portion of mistakes trigger medical malpractice cases.

By of example, if a parent takes his boy to the emergency clinic after a skateboard accident and the ER physician doesn't do x-rays despite an apparent bend in the child's forearm and tells the papa his kid has "simply a sprain" this most likely is medical malpractice. But, if the kid is properly detected within a couple of days and makes a total healing it is unlikely the "damages" are extreme enough to carry out a claim that likely would cost in excess of $50,000.00. However, if because of the delay in being effectively detected, the young boy has to have his arm re-broken and the development plate is irreparably damaged due to the hold-up then the damages likely would necessitate additional investigation and a possible suit.

Other important considerations.

Other concerns that are very important when determining whether a client has a malpractice case consist of the victim's habits and medical history. Did the victim do anything to cause or contribute to the bad medical outcome? A common method of medical malpractice defense attorneys is to blame the client. If it is a birth injury case, did the mother have correct prenatal care, did she smoke or use drugs throughout her pregnancy? In other cases, did the patient follow the medical professional's orders, keep his appointments, take his medicine as advised and tell the doctor the fact? These are truths that we need to understand in order to determine whether the doctor will have a legitimate defense to the malpractice suit?

Exactly what happens if it appears like there is a case?

If check here appears that the patient may have been a victim of a medical error, the medical mistake triggered a significant injury or death and the patient was certified with his medical professional's orders, then we have to get the client's medical records. In many cases, acquiring the medical records includes absolutely nothing more mailing a release signed by the customer to the doctor and/or health center together with a letter asking for the records. When it comes to wrongful death, an executor of the victims estate needs to be designated in the local county probate court and then the executor can sign the release asking for the records.

Once the records are received we examine them to make sure they are complete. It is not unusual in medical neglect cases to receive insufficient medical charts. Once all the pertinent records are obtained they are offered to a qualified medical professional for evaluation and opinion. If the case protests an emergency clinic physician we have an emergency room physician evaluate the case, if it protests a cardiologist we need to acquire an opinion from a cardiologist, etc

. Mostly, exactly what we need to know form the professional is 1) was the treatment supplied below the requirement of care, 2) did the infraction of the requirement of care lead to the patients injury or death? If the medical professionals opinion agrees with on both counts a suit will be prepared on the client's behalf and generally filed in the court of common pleas in the county where the malpractice was devoted or in the county where the offender lives. In some limited circumstances jurisdiction for the malpractice claim could be federal court or some other court.


In sum, a good malpractice lawyer will thoroughly and thoroughly examine any potential malpractice case prior to submitting a claim. It's not fair to the victim or the medical professionals to file a lawsuit unless the specialist informs us that he thinks there is a strong basis to bring the claim. Due to the expense of pursuing a medical negligence action no good lawyer has the time or resources to squander on a "unimportant suit."

When speaking with a malpractice attorney it is very important to precisely offer the lawyer as much detail as possible and answer the legal representative's concerns as completely as possible. Prior to talking to a lawyer think about making some notes so you don't forget some crucial reality or circumstance the attorney may need.

Last but not least, if you believe you may have a malpractice case get in touch with a great malpractice attorney as soon as possible so there are no statute of limitations issues in your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *